A conversation for MRF senior leadership

Seventy-eight years
of doing things right.

The question now is whether the record of it is as strong as the doing of it.

SkyEdgeAI June 2026 Confidential
Act One · The Governance Imperative

Most conversations about AI governance assume the company hasn't built much yet.

That is not this conversation.
SAP ERP — all 10 plants ISO 50001 — all 10 plants IATF 16949 + AS9100D CCTV — all facilities ₹225.5 Cr R&D INROAD — ₹292 Cr
All confirmed in MRF's own published disclosures.
Context · Slide 02
SkyEdgeAI has read everything MRF has published. Every item is sourced to a specific document — not assumed, not inferred.

The SAP ERP is confirmed in the FY25 auditor's report: an integrated system connecting head office, all 10 plants, and other locations, with audit-trail and edit-log functionality. ISO 50001 certification at all 10 plants is confirmed in the ESG Databook FY25, including fortnightly energy performance monitoring against targets, with a current intensity of 8.89 GJ/MT.

IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 at all 10 plants, with AS9100D at Arakonam and Medak, are confirmed in BRSR FY25 — external validation by TUV-Nord and BVQI. The CCTV disclosure is verbatim in BRSR FY25, Principle 3: "CCTV is effectively utilized across all facilities to identify unsafe acts and enable timely behavioural interventions."

The ₹292 Cr INROAD co-investment is confirmed through ATMA programme releases. The iSPEED extension — ₹145 Cr, more than two lakh smallholder farmers — was launched April 2025. Not a single item in this list is flattery. Each is a confirmed fact.

Act One · The Governance Imperative

One number. From MRF's own financial statements.

₹225.5 Cr
R&D Expenditure · FY25
₹18.38 Cr
IT & Digital Services · FY25
12 : 1 ratio
Both from MRF standalone FY25 financial statements
Context · Slide 03
This ratio is not a mistake. It is the record of a company that invested where it knew how to create value. The implication follows naturally.

MRF invested where it knew how to create competitive advantage — product intelligence, material science, compound design, the Trichy R&D mini-factory confirmed by MD Rahul Mammen Mappillai at the Global Investors Meet 2024. The ₹225.5 Cr reflects world-class product capability. That is where MRF's competitive advantage lives.

The ₹18.38 Cr in external IT and digital services is not evidence of neglect. MRF runs lean — SAP ERP, quality systems, and plant-floor controls maintained as internal infrastructure, not vendor-managed sprawl. At ₹28,000 Cr revenue across 10 plants, that is a disciplined operating choice.

What the ratio reveals is a specific gap: the operational intelligence infrastructure — the layer that governs what all of that production produces, evidences every decision, and makes the record of MRF's excellence as strong as the excellence itself — has not received the same investment. SkyEdgeAI's non-intrusive OAL requires minimal new IT services expenditure to close that gap. It reads from what already exists.

Act One · Obligation 01 of 03

The obligation that arrived in FY25.

"Somewhere in your FY25 accounts there is a line item that wasn't there two years ago."
01 ·EPR obligation expense — now confirmed in MRF's financial statements
02 ·Year-end manual reconciliation — current state
03 ·If CPCB asked tomorrow: how long to produce the evidence chain?
The question is not whether you are compliant. You are. The question is whether the evidence of it is as continuous as your compliance itself.
MRF BRSR FY25, Section C, Principle 2 · CPCB Waste Tyre EPR Rules · Slide 10 responds directly
Context · Slide 04
EPR obligation expense is now a financial fact in MRF's accounts. The current manual reconciliation process cannot answer the evidence question with the rigour that CPCB enforcement can require.

MRF has fulfilled the EPR obligation. BRSR FY25, Section C, Principle 2 confirms: certificates procured from registered recyclers, annual return filed on the CPCB portal, obligations met under both End-of-Life Tyre and Plastic EPR regulations. Everything done correctly.

CPCB's 100% Y-2 obligation structure — active from FY 2024-25 — means the financial exposure grows proportionally with production volumes. Sivaganga adds a new plant. As production scales, so does the obligation. If CPCB's enforcement desk asked to see the production and import data underpinning the obligation calculation — reconciled against the certificate balance, with recycler compliance verified for each counterparty — how long would that take to produce?

The recycler risk dimension is relevant: investigations by the Punjab PCB found two-thirds of tyre-fuel factories missing required environmental controls. MRF does not control its recycler counterparties' compliance quality. A certificate purchased from a registered recycler with a compliance lapse has a different risk profile than it appears. Year-end manual reconciliation cannot surface this in real time. Slide 10 shows exactly how SkyEdgeAI addresses this.

Act One · Obligation 02 of 03

The obligation approaching by FY2028.

"When SGS India asks to trace the 1.10 tCO2e/MT figure back to the plant meter that produced it — what does that chain look like?"
Evidence chain SGS India assurance requires ↓
Plant Instrument
Utility meter · WHR boiler · PNG steam · ISO 50001
Data Fabric
Federated · timestamped · source-traceable
Scope 1+2 Calc
Per plant · per SKU · per shift
Authorised Record
Human-reviewed · tamper-evident
BRSR Disclosure
Source-system lineage · not compiled
Currently:
Manual compilation assembled at year-end
Required by FY2028:
Continuous, source-traced evidence chain
Source: MRF ESG Databook FY25 · BRSR FY25 · SGS India assurance confirmation · Slide 11 responds directly
Context · Slide 05
MRF has committed to 25% Scope 1&2 intensity reduction by FY2028. The trajectory is right. The evidence chain from plant floor to BRSR disclosure is the question.

MRF has committed to carbon neutrality by FY2050, with a medium-term target of 25% Scope 1&2 emissions intensity reduction by FY2028 from the FY2023 baseline. FY25 intensity reached 1.10 tCO2e/MT — improved from 1.23 tCO2e/MT. The trajectory is right. The board-level commitment is real and quarterly-reviewed.

MRF's ISO 50001 energy monitoring data exists. The WHR boiler operates at one plant. The PNG gas steam system operates at another. Nitrogen-based curing is deployed at select plants. The instruments are producing data. But the pathway from those plant-floor instruments to the BRSR Core KPI currently runs through manual compilation assembled at year-end.

'Reasonable assurance' — what SGS India provides — is designed precisely to probe that pathway. When the assurance engagement asks: which instrument produced this number, which calculation logic was applied, which human reviewed and approved it before it appeared in the disclosure — a year-end compilation exercise cannot answer that question with the rigour that FY2028's scrutiny will require. Slide 11 shows the complete, continuously-maintained chain.

Act One · Obligation 03 of 03

The obligation that is permanent.

"MRF invested ₹292 crore building the upstream. The thread from that upstream to the compound batch is what's missing."
INROAD: 1,25,272 hectares planted · iSPEED: ₹145 Cr · 2 lakh farmers
EUDR: deforestation-free origin traceability required for every EU-bound tyre
The plantation investment is in place. The digital thread from plantation to compound batch is not.
MRF ESG Databook FY25 · INROAD ATMA releases · EU EUDR Regulation 2023/1115 · Slide 12 responds directly
Context · Slide 06
The INROAD investment creates the upstream plantation data. EUDR requires that this data is connected, through a verified chain, to every EU-bound tyre. That chain does not yet exist for any Indian tyre manufacturer.

EUDR — EU Deforestation Regulation 2023/1115 — requires that before any natural-rubber tyre enters the EU, the importer must demonstrate that the rubber is deforestation-free, legally sourced, and origin-traceable to a specific geolocation. The regulation is current law. MRF exports to 60+ countries; FY25 export revenue reached ₹2,307 crore — 23% growth. EUDR compliance protects every rupee of that growth.

What does not exist — for MRF or any Indian tyre manufacturer currently — is a digital thread connecting plantation geolocation data through the supply chain to the compound batch to the finished tyre to the EU shipment. Without that thread, the EUDR due-diligence statement is a manually assembled declaration rather than a continuously maintained evidence chain.

The same genealogy gap affects OEM qualification and recall readiness. IATF 16949 requires traceability. AS9100D at Arakonam and Medak requires it at aerospace grade, serving Indian Air Force and aviation OEMs. The digital depth of that traceability across 10 plants — how far it reaches, how fast it responds — is the discovery question. Slide 12 shows how SkyEdgeAI builds the complete chain from plantation to customer.

Act One · The Governance Imperative

What India's most advanced tyre manufacturers have achieved — and what even they haven't solved.

Dispatch turnaround
54%
Labour productivity
25%
Cycle-time reduction
18%
Operating cost
31%
Scope 1&2 emissions
47%
WEF Global Lighthouse Network · India tyre manufacturer · Third-party validated
Q ·Who authorised the curing parameter change?
Q ·What is the audit trail if an OEM traces a quality issue to an AI recommendation?
Q ·Is the BRSR metric traceable to its plant source system?

That question is not answered by analytics platforms. It requires an Operational Admissibility Layer.

Context · Slide 07
The India tyre benchmark is not a competitive comparison. It is evidence that these outcomes are achievable in India — and a precise identification of where the market has not yet gone.

India's most advanced tyre peer received WEF Global Lighthouse recognition — the first tyre factory globally. The outcomes: 54% dispatch turnaround improvement, 25% labour productivity, 18% cycle-time reduction, 31% operating-cost improvement, 47% Scope 1&2 emissions reduction. Achieved through approximately 30 digital use cases deployed in roughly 18 months via Siemens Opcenter.

A second India peer deployed a GenAI manufacturing reasoner over curing machine data — achieving 9% productivity increase on primary equipment, 3% energy reduction — using AWS Bedrock and Amazon Neptune for tyre genealogy. India's most advanced digital tyre operations have moved. The benchmarks are real and recent.

What no company in the benchmark has publicly addressed is the governance layer: model versioning, approval, rollback, drift monitoring. Who authorised the AI recommendation. What evidence supported that authorisation. Whether the resulting decision is tamper-evidently recorded and retrievable. This is precisely the layer SkyEdgeAI builds.

Act One · The Governance Imperative

Every operational system MRF has was built to run operations.

"Show me the decision, the evidence that supported it, the person who authorised it, and when."
It needs to be built once, above all of them. Without changing any of them.
Context · Slide 08
The governance layer is the natural next chapter of every programme that deploys AI at operational scale. It is not a criticism of what has been built. It is what comes after.

When AI is generating the recommendations — when a digital twin is guiding press scheduling, when computer vision is flagging defects, when an AI reasoner is suggesting curing parameter changes — a new institutional question emerges: who governed the AI? Who authorised the recommendation? What evidence supported that authorisation? Is the record tamper-evident and retrievable?

This question is not answerable by the existing systems. SAP was built for transactions. SCADA was built for control. ISO 50001 monitoring was built for energy performance. IATF quality records were built for quality management. None was designed to govern what AI produces.

SkyEdgeAI's Operational Admissibility Layer is precisely this: a governed intelligence layer built above existing operational systems — reading from them, not modifying them — that captures every decision as it is made, with its evidence, its human authorisation, and its timestamp, in a form that is tamper-evident and continuously retrievable. It does not replace any existing system. It governs what those systems produce.

Act Two · The SkyEdgeAI Response
One sentence. Before any capability, any feature list, any product catalogue.
SkyEdgeAI reads what MRF already has — and makes every decision it produces governed, evidenced, and defensible.
"READS" = READ-ONLY
Nothing written back. Nothing modified. No existing system touched.
"EVERY DECISION"
Every AI recommendation, quality hold, parameter change — human-authorised, GuardianLedger™-recorded.
"GOVERNED, EVIDENCED"
The record exists before anyone asks — continuously maintained from the moment of the decision.
Context · Slide 09
Every word in this sentence was chosen precisely. "Reads." "Every decision." "Governed, evidenced, and defensible." Each carries a specific architectural and commercial commitment.

"Reads" is not "connects" or "integrates." It means read-only. SkyConnect™ does not write to SAP, does not modify SCADA configurations, does not alter IATF quality records. The 10 plants continue operating exactly as they do today. No cutover. No parallel running. No ERP migration. No change request to any existing system.

"Every decision" is precise — not "strategic decisions." Every AI recommendation through the Command & Control Layer. Every quality hold decision in GuardianLedger™. Every curing parameter change approved by a plant engineer. Every EPR certificate acceptance. Every BRSR energy metric reviewed before disclosure. Each one governed and evidenced.

"Governed, evidenced, and defensible" is an operating state — not the outcome of a specific project. The evidence is continuous. It does not require assembly. When a regulator asks, an OEM audits, a board enquires, or SGS India probes — the answer is a retrieval, not a reconstruction.

Act Two · Response to Obligation 01

The EPR question — answered.

The annual return is not assembled at year-end. It is retrieved.
Before
Year-end reconciliation under deadline
Certificate status: periodic check
Recycler compliance: assumed
CPCB portal: evidence assembled before filing
After — with SkyEdgeAI
Continuous tracking against obligation, daily
Certificate validity: live, always current
Recycler risk: scored and flagged before acceptance
CPCB portal: evidence retrieved from live chain
Governance is evidenced, not asserted.
Context · Slide 10
The ESG & Compliance Layer reads from SAP in real time. The EPR evidence chain is built and maintained continuously — not assembled under pressure at year-end.

The ESG & Compliance Layer reads production and import volumes from SAP in real time. The EPR obligation threshold is calculated automatically against actual output — no year-end calculation under deadline, no risk of arithmetic error. The obligation is tracked daily.

Certificate tracking is automated: validity dates, coverage against the obligation balance, transfer status, and recycler due-diligence trail are all maintained as a live record. When a certificate is accepted, it is assessed against the recycler's compliance history — not taken at face value. Counterparties with compliance lapses are flagged before acceptance, not after the annual return is filed.

GuardianLedger™ captures every EPR decision — every obligation match, every certificate acceptance, every annual return data point — as a tamper-evident, timestamped, human-authorised record. The CPCB portal annual return is not assembled from scattered records. It is retrieved. For MRF's multi-plant estate, each of the 10 plants is tracked individually with central oversight. Sivaganga is added without re-architecture.

Act Two · Response to Obligation 02

The BRSR evidence chain — complete.

The complete chain — continuously maintained ↓
Plant Instrument
ISO 50001 · WHR boiler · PNG steam · utility meters
SkyConnect™
Read-only · timestamped · source-traceable
Scope 1+2 Calc
Per SKU · per plant · per press · per shift
GuardianLedger™
Tamper-evident · human-authorised · immutable
BRSR Disclosure
Source-system lineage · SGS assurance-ready
·FY28 target tracked continuously — per plant, per press, per shift
·WHR boiler + PNG steam + nitrogen curing — modelled together, not separately
·Every SGS India source question answered by retrieval, not reconstruction
Capabilities: ESG & Compliance Layer · TwinCore™ · GuardianLedger™ · DataGuardian™ + SkyConnect™
Context · Slide 11
TwinCore™ models MRF's three interacting energy variables together for the first time — while GuardianLedger™ ensures every BRSR metric has an unbroken chain back to the instrument that produced it.

MRF currently has three confirmed, interacting energy variables: WHR boiler steam (one plant), PNG-fuelled steam (one plant), and nitrogen-based curing (select plants). Currently these are monitored separately. ISO 50001 tracks each individually. None is modelled against the others. The optimisation that comes from understanding how press scheduling affects WHR boiler load, how nitrogen curing assignments affect steam demand, how PNG combustion efficiency responds to the curing queue — none of that exists today.

TwinCore™ models all three together as a unified system. Every optimisation recommendation is human-authorised before any parameter changes. Every approved change is GuardianLedger™-recorded with the operator's decision, the evidence basis, and the timestamp.

The Scope 1&2 carbon accounting layer reads from those instruments automatically — per SKU, per plant, per press, per shift. The current FY25 intensity of 1.10 tCO2e/MT improves toward the 25% reduction target with full visibility at granularities that aggregate-level monitoring cannot provide. When SGS India traces an energy intensity figure for FY2028 assurance, they are reading a continuously maintained chain — not a year-end compilation.

Act Two · Response to Obligation 03

The genealogy chain — plantation to customer.

The INROAD investment built the upstream. SkyEdgeAI connects it to the downstream.
NR Origin Compound Batch Component Green Tyre Curing Press Inspection Customer
EUDR extension: INROAD plantation geolocation → compound batch → EU shipment declaration
·Recall containment: affected lot identified before the end of the call
·OEM audit evidence: retrieved from GuardianLedger™, not assembled under pressure
·EUDR due-diligence: from live data, not a manual declaration at export
Capabilities: DataGuardian™ · SkyConnect™ · GuardianLedger™ · ESG & Compliance Layer (EUDR)
Context · Slide 12
DataGuardian™ constructs the genealogy graph from existing MRF systems without modifying any of them. The EUDR thread connects INROAD's plantation data to the compound batch — completing the chain MRF's upstream investment makes possible.

DataGuardian™ constructs the genealogy graph by reading from existing MRF systems — ERP, LIMS, quality records, supplier data — without modifying any of them. The chain from compound batch to dispatch lot is built from what already exists. The EUDR extension connects INROAD's plantation geolocation data to the compound batch assignment — completing the thread that MRF's ₹292 crore upstream investment makes possible but does not, by itself, create.

What a completed genealogy chain changes: a recall notice that currently requires days of manual tracing becomes a query on a graph database — answered before the call ends. An OEM PPAP or AS9100D audit evidence request that currently requires assembling records from LIMS, ERP, quality logs, and press records becomes a GuardianLedger™ retrieval. A EUDR due-diligence statement becomes a continuously maintained chain with verifiable geolocation links.

The read-only integration principle applies throughout. SkyConnect™ reads from every existing system. Nothing is modified. The genealogy chain is built above the existing infrastructure, not inside it. The 10 plants continue operating exactly as today.

Act Two · The SkyEdgeAI Response

What your team's Tuesday morning looks like.

The Quality Head
"A recall notice arrives. I open one screen. The lot, the presses, the customers — identified before the end of the call."
The CFO
"The BRSR energy chapter is not assembled in January. It is retrieved. SGS India asks for the source data. I send a link."
The EHS Head
"The EPR annual return is not a deadline I manage. It is a record I maintain. The balance is visible every day."
The COO
"The curing press that changed parameters last Tuesday — the recommendation, the engineer who approved it, the result — one record."
The CIO
"Nothing changed in any existing system. SkyEdgeAI read from them. The 10 plants are running exactly as they were."
The MD
"When the board asks how a decision was made, the record exists — not because someone wrote it up. Because it was kept."
Act Two · The SkyEdgeAI Response

What does not change.

SkyEdgeAI is a read-only layer. It does not write back to any existing system. Not now, not in Phase 1, not ever.
  • SAP ERP — unchanged
  • ISO 50001 energy monitoring — unchanged
  • IATF 16949 / AS9100D quality records — unchanged
  • PLC / SCADA / plant-floor control — unchanged
  • CCTV safety monitoring — unchanged
The only thing that changes is what happens to every decision those systems produce.
Context · Slide 14
The non-intrusive integration model is not a positioning choice — it is an architectural constraint that SkyEdgeAI maintains categorically, for every deployment.

The IEC 62443 OT security architecture is overlaid above the existing plant-floor control layer — not inserted into it. Network segmentation, access control, and remote-access governance are implemented as an additional layer. No existing PLC configuration is modified. No SCADA parameter is changed. No historian data is altered.

The ₹18.38 Cr IT services spend context is relevant: an integration approach that requires MRF's IT team to manage a complex new system, maintain new vendor relationships, and support new internal user bases would not fit MRF's operating model. SkyEdgeAI's OAL is designed to be thin — reading from what already exists, adding governance above it, requiring minimal new IT overhead to operate.

For the CIO: the existing ERP architecture, workflows, and permissions are entirely unchanged. The existing historian, SCADA, and quality system configurations are entirely unchanged. The IT team is not acquiring a new system to maintain. They are adding a governance overlay that reads from systems they already manage — with IEC 62443-compliant OT security added as part of the integration architecture.

Act Two · Highest-ROI Operational Use Case

Three confirmed variables. One unsolved optimisation.

WHR Boiler Steam
one plant: steam from waste heat recovery boiler
PNG-Fuelled Steam
one plant: moved from carbon-intensive fuel to Piped Natural Gas
Nitrogen Curing
select plants: reduces thermal energy demand per tyre
None of these is currently modelled against the others.
TwinCore™ models them together. Every recommendation human-authorised. Every approved change GuardianLedger™-recorded.
9%productivity increase on primary equipment
3%energy reduction from AI manufacturing reasoner over curing data
India tyre peer benchmark · All three variables confirmed in MRF ESG Databook FY25
Context · Slide 15
Curing is simultaneously MRF's highest-energy process, its most capital-intensive bottleneck, and its primary quality-risk point — and it has three confirmed interacting variables that are currently managed separately.

The WHR boiler efficiency depends on press scheduling: how many presses are opening simultaneously, what condensate is available, what de-superheating load is required. The PNG combustion efficiency responds to the curing queue and to ambient conditions. The nitrogen curing press assignments affect thermal demand per tyre. All three interact. None is currently modelled against the others. ISO 50001 monitors each separately.

India's most advanced tyre peer achieved 9% productivity increase on primary equipment and 3% energy reduction by deploying a GenAI manufacturing reasoner over curing machine data. That reasoner generates insights. What it does not produce is a governed output: the record of who authorised the recommendation, what evidence supported it, what changed as a result. SkyEdgeAI's TwinCore™ is the insight and the governance in the same system.

The bladder RUL prediction component compounds the value: unplanned bladder failures at the curing press create schedule disruption, quality incidents, and maintenance cost simultaneously. Predicting remaining useful life from press cycle data and defect linkage history — and scheduling replacement before failure — addresses three consequences of a single failure mode. Every replacement recommendation is human-authorised and GuardianLedger™-recorded.

Act Two · The Complete Platform

Eight native capabilities. All active for MRF.

CAP 01
GuardianLedger™
Tamper-evident decision records across all three obligations
CAP 02
DataGuardian™ + SkyConnect™
Compound genealogy, batch-to-tyre traceability, EUDR
CAP 03
TwinCore™
Curing press bank, steam demand, WHR boiler, bladder RUL
CAP 04
EdgeVision™
Surface defect detection, PPE compliance, hot-work verification
CAP 05
AI Analytics
Scrap RCA, press OEE, compressed-air loss, predictive maintenance
CAP 06
InfraOps
IEC 62443 OT security, AI model versioning, drift monitoring
CAP 07
ESG & Compliance Layer
EPR, BRSR carbon, EUDR traceability, REACH/PAH
CAP 08
Command & Control Layer
AI governance, HITL authorisation, GenAI copilot

All eight read from existing systems. None writes back to any of them.

Context · Slide 16
Each capability was activated in response to a specific named problem in Act One — not presented as a product catalogue, but as the technical answer to what MRF has confirmed is missing.

GuardianLedger™ answers the EPR evidence question, the BRSR source-chain question, and the OEM audit trail question simultaneously. DataGuardian™ and SkyConnect™ answer the genealogy gap and EUDR thread. TwinCore™ answers the three-variable curing optimisation problem. ESG & Compliance Layer answers all three obligations — EPR, BRSR, and EUDR.

Command & Control Layer answers the governance-of-AI question the benchmark slide raises. InfraOps addresses the OT cybersecurity posture implied by the confirmed PLC/SCADA infrastructure: IEC 62443-compliant architecture, OT asset inventory, AI model versioning, drift monitoring, and rollback.

EdgeVision™ builds on the confirmed CCTV infrastructure across all facilities. The hardware exists, the network exists. AI quality inspection with governed disposition — confidence-scored, human-authorised, IATF-admissible disposition records — adds capability to infrastructure MRF already owns. The GenAI Manufacturing Copilot addresses the concentration of tacit process knowledge in an experienced workforce — capturing shift logs, maintenance history, and troubleshooting playbooks as a governed, queryable knowledge base.

Act Three · The Evidence of Value

Five value streams. Each grounded in MRF's own numbers.

Energy Cost Reduction
Cost Reduction

MRF confirmed: 8.89 GJ/MT intensity. India peer achieved 47% Scope 1&2 reduction. TwinCore™ models WHR, PNG, and nitrogen curing together for the first time.

5% on est. ₹4–5,000 Cr energy base →
₹200–250 Cr annually. Conservative.

Scrap & Rework
Yield & Quality

At ₹28,000 Cr scale, each 0.1% scrap reduction ≈ ₹28 Cr. Genealogy, curing intelligence, and governed inspection address the three primary drivers.

0.3% reduction →
₹84 Cr annually.
India peer implies higher.

Compliance Exposure
Risk Avoidance

EPR: now a P&L line item. Export revenue: ₹2,307 Cr FY25 — 23% growth. EUDR is current law. BRSR restatement risk deepens every year toward FY28.

₹2,307 Cr export revenue protected from EUDR risk.
Protection values.

Curing Press Availability
Capacity & Uptime

1% press OEE improvement across MRF's 10-plant fleet unlocks capacity equivalent to avoiding new press capex. Bladder RUL prediction reduces unplanned failures.

1% OEE improvement →
equiv. ₹50–100 Cr
avoided capex annually.

Sivaganga Design-In
Strategic

₹5,300 Cr over 12 years. Design-in costs 4–8× less than retrofitting. Sivaganga designed with SkyEdgeAI becomes the standard template for harmonising all 10 existing plants.

4–8× cost multiplier avoided across 11 plants.
Strategic value that dwarfs any single stream.

Context · Slide 17
Each stream is grounded in a confirmed MRF figure. The financial logic derives from MRF's actual scale and confirmed operating parameters — not generic industry benchmarks.

Energy: MRF's confirmed intensity is 8.89 GJ/MT with ISO 50001 at all 10 plants. Energy costs represent approximately 15–18% of tyre manufacturing cost of goods — at ₹28,000 Cr revenue that implies a ₹4,000–5,000 Cr annual energy cost base. India's most advanced peer achieved 47% Scope 1&2 reduction. A conservative 5% improvement is ₹200–250 Cr annually.

Scrap: tyre manufacturing scrap typically runs 2–5% of production value without AI-level genealogy and RCA. At ₹28,000 Cr, each 0.1% of scrap reduction is approximately ₹28 Cr. The three primary scrap drivers — compound batch variation, curing process drift, and inspection inconsistency — are addressed by DataGuardian™, TwinCore™, and EdgeVision™ respectively.

Compliance: the ₹2,307 Cr is MRF's confirmed FY25 export revenue. EUDR is current law. If a major EU customer requires EUDR due-diligence evidence that MRF cannot provide, that customer relationship is at risk. Sivaganga: the 4–8× cost multiplier for governance retrofit vs design-in is an industry-observed ratio. At ₹5,300 Cr over 12 years, architecture decisions made in the next 6–12 months determine the cost and capability profile of the entire programme.

Act Three · The Evidence of Value

These numbers are observed, not projected.

Dispatch turnaround
54%
Labour productivity
25%
Cycle-time reduction
18%
Operating cost
31%
Scope 1&2 emissions
47%
WEF Global Lighthouse Network · India tyre manufacturer · Third-party validated
The peer that achieved these outcomes required a strong operational foundation as a prerequisite. MRF has that foundation — and in each dimension, MRF's starting position is stronger than the peer's was when they started.
The distance to these outcomes is the governance layer above the foundation.
Context · Slide 18
MRF's starting position is stronger than the WEF Lighthouse peer's was when they began. The distance to equivalent outcomes is shorter — and the governance layer SkyEdgeAI adds is what closes it.

WEF Global Lighthouse recognition for an India tyre manufacturer — the first globally — validates that these outcomes are achievable in an Indian manufacturing context. The 47% Scope 1&2 emissions reduction is the most directly relevant benchmark for MRF's FY2028 25% intensity target. MRF's target requires a smaller proportional improvement than what the peer achieved — and MRF's energy infrastructure provides a more instrumented starting point.

The GenAI manufacturing peer's 9% productivity gain is the curing intelligence benchmark. SkyEdgeAI's TwinCore™ plus DataGuardian™ is architecturally analogous — with the governance layer that peer's solution lacks.

"MRF's foundation is stronger" is not flattery. It is a specific architectural observation. ISO 50001 certification at all 10 plants means the energy monitoring infrastructure is already in place. IATF 16949 and AS9100D means the quality management infrastructure is already in place. SAP ERP means the enterprise data backbone is already in place. The peer that achieved the WEF Lighthouse results started from a less instrumented position. MRF's foundation compresses the time to equivalent outcomes.

Act Three · Sivaganga Greenfield

The architecture window that exists right now.

Signed
4 March 2026
Location
SIPCOT, Sivaganga TN
Investment
₹5,300 Cr
Timeline
12 years
Without governance designed in
· Sivaganga replicates the brownfield fragmentation of plants 1–10
· IEC 62443 retrofitted after commissioning — 4–8× more expensive
· Early decisions unrecorded. Brownfield harmonisation has no template.
With GuardianOS™ from Day 1
· Standard data backbone defined before equipment procurement
· Digital commissioning acceptance criteria as go-live requirements
· Sivaganga becomes the template for all 10 existing plants
The architecture decisions are being made in the next 6–12 months. This window does not reopen.
Context · Slide 19
The architecture design-in window is not a theoretical concept. Major manufacturing plant governance decisions are made during the design and procurement phase — and retrofitting them costs 4–8× more.

The MoU for Sivaganga was signed on 4 March 2026 — confirmed by stock exchange filing. ₹5,300 crore over 12 years. SIPCOT Industrial Park, Sivaganga District, Tamil Nadu — MRF's fourth Tamil Nadu plant. Subject to customised incentive package and statutory approvals.

The IEC 62443 OT security architecture is approximately 4–8× cheaper to implement as a design-in than as a retrofit on a live plant. The GuardianLedger™ evidence chain, starting from first production, creates a plant-of-record from Day 1 rather than requiring retroactive evidence construction. Digital commissioning acceptance criteria — genealogy trace, OEE capture, energy metering, recipe enforcement, cyber segmentation — defined before any equipment arrives means these are go-live requirements, not post-go-live aspirations.

The Sivaganga-as-template argument is equally important. MRF currently operates 10 plants — each likely with different PLC generations, SCADA vendors, historian configurations, and data granularity. Cross-plant benchmarking is not currently possible without data normalisation. Sivaganga, designed with a standard data backbone, becomes the architecture template for that normalisation — a programme that currently has no starting point gets one.

Act Three · Phase 0 · Days 0 – 90

What 90 days delivers — before any further commitment.

Weeks 1–3
Connect & Baseline
  • SkyConnect™ reads from 2–3 pilot plants — non-intrusively
  • EPR certificate status assessed vs CPCB records
  • ISO 50001 energy data baseline established
  • Asset hierarchy and data quality mapped
Weeks 4–6
Evidence Engine Live
  • EPR reconciliation and BRSR energy evidence running
  • GuardianLedger™ capturing first records
  • Automated BRSR energy draft from source systems
  • First EPR obligation gap report
Weeks 7–10
Genealogy & Curing
  • Genealogy baseline — one product family, compound to dispatch
  • TwinCore™ calibrated against actual MRF curing data
  • Press OEE loss tree for plant engineering team
  • Recall containment test: lot isolation demonstrated
Weeks 11–12
Board-Ready Evidence
  • BRSR chapter: automated, full source lineage documented
  • EPR return data: reconciled, GuardianLedger™-documented
  • Genealogy demonstration for one OEM product family
  • Phase 1 roadmap: agreed jointly — not asserted by SkyEdgeAI

After Phase 0: both MRF and SkyEdgeAI have confirmed the integration, validated the ROI baseline, and agreed Phase 1 terms. No commitment to Phase 1 is made at the start of Phase 0.

Context · Slide 20
Phase 0 is designed to be genuinely low-risk for MRF's operations. No production system is modified. The 2–3 pilot plants continue operating exactly as today throughout.

No production system is modified during Phase 0. No plant-floor configuration changes. No ERP change request. No cutover. SkyConnect™ reads; it does not write. The 2–3 pilot plants continue operating exactly as today throughout the 90 days.

What MRF receives at the end of 90 days that it does not have today: a continuously-operating EPR evidence chain from production data to certificate balance; an automated BRSR energy chapter for the pilot plants with source-system lineage; a genealogy baseline for one product family that demonstrates lot isolation capability in minutes; and a curing press digital twin calibrated against actual MRF steam and OEE data — not a template, MRF's data.

The Phase 1 roadmap is agreed jointly at the end of Phase 0, based on confirmed evidence. Not asserted by SkyEdgeAI based on a pre-sale projection. The ROI estimates in Act Three are conservative by design — the Phase 0 baseline replaces estimates with confirmed measurements at MRF's actual scale, in MRF's actual plants, against MRF's actual data quality.

About SkyEdgeAI

For the reader encountering SkyEdgeAI for the first time.

Founded 2024 · Bengaluru · DPIIT-Recognised
Deeptech startup, government recognised
Proprietary AI — not open-source, not OpenAI
InfAIra-powered. Every capability designed for industrial governance.
IndustrialGuardian™ — 26 sectors, 86 domains
Tyre manufacturing-specific domain depth. Mapped from first principles.
GeM Registered
Government procurement pathway active
Why not an MES vendor?
They modify systems. We read from them.
Why not a generic AI analytics platform?
They produce recommendations. We govern them.
Why not a consulting firm?
They recommend once. We evidence continuously.
Why not wait for Sivaganga?
Those architecture decisions are being made now.
"Where other platforms stop at capability, SkyEdgeAI adds continuous assurance."
Context · Slide 21
SkyEdgeAI was founded with a specific thesis: that the industrial AI market would reach a point where capability without governance would become a liability. That point is now.

SkyEdgeAI was founded in 2024 with a specific thesis: that the industrial AI market would reach a point — faster than most expected — where capability without governance would become a liability rather than an advantage. That point is now. The regulatory environment (EUDR, BRSR mandatory assurance, CPCB EPR enforcement, OEM audit pressure) has arrived simultaneously across multiple industries.

The InfAIra technology platform is proprietary. GuardianLedger™'s tamper-evident record architecture requires that the evidence chain is not vulnerable to model replacement, API deprecation, or third-party platform decisions. A governance layer built on an open-source LLM or a third-party API is not genuinely tamper-evident. SkyEdgeAI's proprietary architecture ensures the governance integrity of every record it produces.

The founding team brings specific domain depth: Devi Prasad Vuriti's four decades in process-intensive manufacturing (cement, power, fertiliser) provides the OT integration credibility that IT-only governance vendors lack. Kameswara Rao Tangudu's integration architecture experience underpins SkyConnect™. The tyre manufacturing domain mapping was built from scratch — not adapted from a pharma or FMCG template.

MRF has built 78 years of operational excellence. SkyEdgeAI adds the layer that governs, evidences, and protects what that excellence produces.

We are not asking MRF to commit to anything today. If one thing in this conversation felt true — that is enough to start.
For the MD / Chairman
A 60-minute conversation.
Not a demo. We come prepared with MRF's situation. We listen more than we talk.
For the COO / Plant Head
Phase 0 — 90 days, 2–3 plants.
No disruption. Evidence pack before the next audit cycle. No commitment beyond Phase 0.
For the CIO
A technical architecture session.
How SkyConnect™ reads from MRF's specific systems. IT overhead answered before any commitment.
skyedge.ai · DPIIT-Recognised · GeM Registered · Bengaluru
Appendix — For the Discovery Conversation
Reference Material
Use case register · Discovery questions for the first session.
Slides 24 – 25
Appendix · Use Case Register

12 Priority Use Cases — MRF Mapping

P0 = immediate · P1 = high-ROI operational · Strategic = architecture / long-horizon
UC-01 · P0
Compound Batch-to-Tyre Genealogy & Recall
DataGuardian™ · SkyConnect™ · GuardianLedger™
UC-02 · P0
Curing Press Intelligence — OEE, Steam, Bladder RUL
TwinCore™ · AI Analytics · GuardianLedger™
UC-03 · P0
CPCB Waste-Tyre EPR Evidence Management
ESG & Compliance Layer · GuardianLedger™
UC-04 · P0
AI Vision Inspection with Governed Disposition
EdgeVision™ · Command & Control · InfraOps
UC-05 · P0
EHS Risk Intelligence & Incident Evidence
EdgeVision™ · AI Analytics · ESG Layer
UC-06 · P0
Energy, Steam & Carbon Intelligence — FY28
TwinCore™ · AI Analytics · ESG & Compliance Layer
UC-07 · P1
Manufacturing Knowledge Graph & GenAI Copilot
DataGuardian™ · Command & Control Layer
UC-08 · P1
Brownfield Multi-Plant Standardisation
DataGuardian™ · SkyConnect™ · InfraOps
UC-09 · P1
Supply Chain S&OP Governance & NR Risk
AI Analytics · ESG Layer · GuardianLedger™
UC-10 · Strategic
Connected Tyre Field-to-Factory Loop
AI Analytics · DataGuardian™ · Command & Control
UC-11 · P0
BRSR Carbon Neutrality Evidence Architecture
ESG & Compliance Layer · GuardianLedger™
UC-12 · Strategic
Sivaganga Greenfield — Architecture Design-In
Full OAL Platform · GuardianOS™
Appendix · Discovery Questions

20 Questions for the First Session

← → keys or swipe to navigate